From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 13:33:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFFC1065680 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 13:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBBF28FC15 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 13:33:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from psteele@maxiscale.com) Received: from source ([209.85.146.177]) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSgl6tEcuWEvRMlJJOTUhZeX8MXUpF1fO@postini.com; Tue, 12 May 2009 06:33:40 PDT Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m34so1396634wag.26 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 06:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.196.13 with SMTP id t13mr6649783waf.82.1242135219819; Tue, 12 May 2009 06:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([76.231.178.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k35sm7575552waf.22.2009.05.12.06.33.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 May 2009 06:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 06:33:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Steele To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <6044475.2401242135180402.JavaMail.HALO$@halo> In-Reply-To: <30891392.2381242135163014.JavaMail.HALO$@halo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Tim Judd , #freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Wake-on-LAN support in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:33:41 -0000 >Tim, I know nothing about WOL on FreeBSD, but according to the wiki, >development just started in 8 CURRENT: >http://wiki.freebsd.org/WakeOnLan I came across that same reference. Unfortunately we're stuck on 7.0. I take it the point of the "wol" command that available in the ports collection is that it can be used to wake any system that supports wake-on-LAN, and these systems can be running any OS. So, based on what I've read here and in my searches, for wake-on-LAN to work on a given system, the NIC itself has to support this feature, and in addition the OS has to be able to enable this feature (via the driver for the NIC). It seems likely that when this appears that a new option will be provided for the ifconfig command. Since we're stuck on 7.0, I guess the only option is to implement it ourselves...