From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Apr 9 08:37:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA26699 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA26692 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from East.Sun.COM ([129.148.1.241]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id IAA27735; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:43:24 -0700 Received: from suneast.East.Sun.COM by East.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3) id LAA04385; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 11:35:01 -0400 Received: from compound.east.sun.com by suneast.East.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA29501; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 11:35:01 -0400 Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.east.sun.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) id KAA01745; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 10:35:09 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 10:35:09 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: Anthony.Kimball@East.Sun.COM Message-Id: <199704091535.KAA01745@compound.east.sun.com> From: Tony Kimball MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: vince@mail.MCESTATE.COM Cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? References: <334A9941.45A5@persprog.com> X-Face: O9M"E%K;(f-Go/XDxL+pCxI5*gr[=FN@Y`cl1.Tn Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Vincent Poy on Wed, 9 April: : : Hopefully but I don't think anyone will get a TX board after all : the comments ;-) : I beg to differ. It is the only set supporting SDRAM! It seems one's choice is between a fast small memory system and a slow large memory one. An unpleasant tradeoff, to be sure, but I would expect anyone who intends not to add more than 64MB RAM to the current generation motherboard to prefer the SDRAM support.