Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Mar 1995 18:55:06 -0800
From:      David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP - About removing libgcc.so.261 
Message-ID:  <199503110255.SAA00129@corbin.Root.COM>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Mar 95 12:04:04 %2B1000." <199503110204.MAA15780@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>Actually, I guess I have found an even better solution:
>>>
>>>	move ths shared libgcc to /usr/lib/FreeBSD-2.0-compat
>>>	tell ldconfig about that directory.
>>>
>>>ld should not find it, but ldconfig will...
>
>>   This will work (and we should do this), but people doing upgrades will
>>still have the old libgcc.so. I'll be committing a (very) good fix for the
>>problem shortly.
>
>The same fix is probably required for other previously-shared libraries
>such as libcompat.
>
>I'm still concerned about the static libgcc unnecessarily bloating all
>executables by 4K, partly because the of linkage order bugs.

   It doesn't bloat anything I tried by 4k...very little if anything seems to
be included from it.

-DG



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503110255.SAA00129>