From owner-freebsd-ipfw Fri Mar 3 15:59:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655DA37B6F8 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 15:59:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@cyrus.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (robert@fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA70423; Fri, 3 Mar 2000 19:00:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@cyrus.watson.org) Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 19:00:38 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org Reply-To: Robert Watson To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: ipdivert and ethernet bridging Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a 3.4-STABLE box which I have enabled ethernet bridging, bridging and ipfw, and also ipdivert, as I would like to transform/process some packets as they pass through the bridge using a userland process. However, the results so far seem not to be good--while the packet due indeed disappear from processing at the divert rule, they never reappear following it, or reach the userland process :-(. Packets originating locally on the bridge box seem to be processed fine. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on whether this should be something that works, or how I could get it to work? I'm not averse to using -current instead, if necessary. Robert N M Watson robert@fledge.watson.org http://www.watson.org/~robert/ PGP key fingerprint: AF B5 5F FF A6 4A 79 37 ED 5F 55 E9 58 04 6A B1 TIS Labs at Network Associates, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message