From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 3 07:05:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBAA5207; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "theravensnest.org", Issuer "theravensnest.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928F81C5; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cpc14-cmbg15-2-0-cust307.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.26.1.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s3375rN3062400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Apr 2014 07:05:56 GMT (envelope-from theraven@theravensnest.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: WDS with a FreeBSD access point From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 08:05:48 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <533BD60D.9050701@weboutsourcing.cz> <533CD386.80906@weboutsourcing.cz> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 07:05:58 -0000 On 3 Apr 2014, at 07:57, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Are both freebsd APs? Nope, the main station is a FreeBSD box, the remote is a cheap commodity = AP (there are a lot that claim to do WDS for under =A310 - I have two = different models for testing). > It looks reasonably straightfoward. I really should just give this a > go at home on an extender AP and test the hell out of it. Let me know how it goes... > So, for wifi traffic, you absolutely want the wifi VAPs in a bridge > group as the traffic between stations and APs is all layer-2. I think I'm missing something here. The script created a bridge between = the wireless and wired interfaces. I don't think I want that, so what = do I want the bridge between? > There's > no routing involved. If you want to route between the bridge0 > interface and the rest of the system then please do so but do put the > STA and AP VAPs into the same bridge group. 'STA and AP VAPs'? Can we go back to assuming that I don't know = anything please? David