From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 20 00:20:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900461065672 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 00:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334178FC15 for ; Thu, 20 May 2010 00:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17587 invoked from network); 20 May 2010 00:20:15 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 20 May 2010 00:20:14 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B7D5082F; Wed, 19 May 2010 20:20:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 46FE31CC66; Wed, 19 May 2010 20:20:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: osp@aloha.com References: <201005200000.o4K00OI1017924@yoda.pixi.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 20:20:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201005200000.o4K00OI1017924@yoda.pixi.com> (osp@aloha.com's message of "Wed, 19 May 2010 14:00:24 HST") Message-ID: <44vdajl8zv.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.2 to 8.0 upgrade issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 00:20:19 -0000 osp@aloha.com writes: > Note that the handbook does not show -a and -R being used together. My > thinking is that without the -R a new version of an existing port that > requires something new -- that you do not already have -- will fail. Rather > unlikely, to start with portupgrade -a --batch and use -R only if you still > getb errors. This is incorrect. "-R" is *entirely* redundant when "-a" is specified.