From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 16 17:33:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104123E0; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:33:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A5F2EA8; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C51862D3; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C8DC61493; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:33:03 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Jamie Gritton Subject: Re: jail configuration References: <8661u2kppt.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130916130543.GA73887@zxy.spb.ru> <86k3igki36.fsf@nine.des.no> <52370AD3.2060909@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 19:33:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <52370AD3.2060909@FreeBSD.org> (Jamie Gritton's message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2013 07:42:43 -0600") Message-ID: <868uywk6y8.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:33:16 -0000 Jamie Gritton writes: > Yes, I've let jail startup go for too long - I really meant to put it in > for 10.0 but the recent slush kind of surprised me (which means I'm just > not keeping up). After 10 splits off, it's time to just do it. How about we just ask agree on a patch, then ask re@? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no