From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 11 16:23:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA1516A4DE; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B6643D45; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:23:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from craig@feniz.gank.org) Received: by ion.gank.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0262B115DD; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:23:34 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:23:32 -0500 From: Craig Boston To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20060711162331.GA38320@nowhere> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Boston , Brooks Davis , User Freebsd , Pyun YongHyeon , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy , Atanas , Robert Watson , Michael Vince References: <20060707181750.O1171@ganymede.hub.org> <20060707223609.N60542@fledge.watson.org> <20060708033254.GB87930@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20060708172001.GB77281@ip.net.ua> <6.2.3.4.0.20060709234941.12531860@64.7.153.2> <20060710010540.G1799@ganymede.hub.org> <6.2.3.4.0.20060710001040.125441e0@64.7.153.2> <20060710070951.GA23181@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060710175447.A1799@ganymede.hub.org> <20060710215627.GA3507@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060710215627.GA3507@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Pyun YongHyeon , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy , Atanas , User Freebsd , Robert Watson , Michael Vince Subject: Re: em device hangs on ifconfig alias ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:23:38 -0000 On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:56:27PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:55:23PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote: > > >On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:11:36AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >Of course, any reasonable administrator would configure > > > > > > interface FastEthernet0/1 > > > spanning-tree portfast > It tells the switch that this port will never be anything but a leaf in > the tree so STP does not need to re run before allowing packets to flow. > If you do this and then create a loop with it, bad things happen, but > cisco recommends it in general. Note that STP still runs, it just doesn't start out blocking the port. Any "bad things" will only happen until the switch figures out that there is a loop, which usually happens fairly quickly. Worst case scenario: you may have a packet storm for a second or two. All the switches I've tried it on detect the loop very quickly (after only a few packets), so I usually just enable portfast across the board. Craig