From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 29 20:47:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA00697 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 20:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA00692 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 20:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1) id 0wMQMI-0002YJ-00; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:47:10 -0600 To: spork Subject: Re: 2.2.X ping -l == ping -f Cc: John Capo , hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:55:13 EDT." References: Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 21:47:10 -0600 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message spork writes: : I do like the side-effect this produces; namely, joe user can't do a : "pseudo ping-flood" by setting a huge preload. That was the intended effect. : 2.1.7.1 allows a big preload value, which I didn't care for... Yuck. I thought I had back ported it. Are you asking for this to be placed into the 2.1 stable branch? Warner