Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 01:10:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org> To: Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Concurrent package making allowed? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980627010628.4205A-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <19980627125701.16222@welearn.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Jun 1998, Sue Blake wrote: > Does dependency mean it will be installed automatically? Jeez, I'd hate > to attempt to install oneko and come back to find all of X clogging my > little modem. That's why X is an exception to the normal dependency handling. :-) > cdplay-0.92 Come'on! Read the COMMENT, at least! That one's claim to fame is that it _doesn't_ require X. In fact, I just fixed it to work on (my) IDE cdroms, and added a nifty pause function. Above and beyond the call of a porter! (Ah, but I'm not just a porter, I'm also a user! ;) > I happen to know that I won't get far with staroffice xemacs or kirc, > but that's luck. Not all ports called x<something> can be discounted either. Hm. I'm not so sure about xemacs. It might work without X, actually.... Don't bother trying---it's still emacs, either way. ;) -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980627010628.4205A-100000>