From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 9 07:24:56 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA27935 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 07:24:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA27927 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 07:24:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA06301; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 07:22:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Richard Wackerbarth cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which DHCP client In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Feb 1999 08:22:15 CST." Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 07:22:47 -0800 Message-ID: <6298.918573767@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I object to the idea that the selection of which dhcp client > is being made on the basis that David has commit privledges > and I do not. Further, it is clear that David has not used a > recent release of the isc client and is biasing his opinion > with false assertions. Hmmmm. From where I'm sitting, it looked more to me like he was selecting it based on the fact that he liked the WIDE client a lot more. I personally am ambivalent about which client is chosen just so long as *a* client is chosen. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message