Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 22:57:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl (Wilko Bulte) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, sos@freebsd.dk, julian@whistle.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DEVFS/SLICE passes milestone Message-ID: <199711272257.PAA13589@usr07.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199711271821.TAA01333@yedi.iaf.nl> from "Wilko Bulte" at Nov 27, 97 07:21:43 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I know :), I just wanted to get this straight, we don't want a new > > > "inherrently broken by design" subsystem again. > > > > Inre this comment and the previous comment about my large patches > > to the filesystem: my union mounts work, do yours? > > Oh OH! Are you people preparing to start a major flamefest again? No. I was simply addressing the backhanded putdown of code that works in the context of ``we don't want a new "inherrently broken by design" subsystem again''. The current VFS code meets that criteria. I can phrase it another way, if you want: You don't want a new one... but you want to keep the old ones? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711272257.PAA13589>