From owner-cvs-all Tue Feb 20 21:24:23 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A69137B503; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:24:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org) Received: from billy-club.village.org (billy-club.village.org [10.0.0.3]) by rover.village.org (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1L5OFh60740; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:24:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org) Received: from billy-club.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by billy-club.village.org (8.11.2/8.8.3) with ESMTP id f1L5Lds04947; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:21:39 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200102210521.f1L5Lds04947@billy-club.village.org> To: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk Cc: Kris Kennaway , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:31:17 +1100." References: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:21:38 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Bruce Evans writes: : I have changed my mind a bit about this. MACHINE_CPU is not (yet?) nearly : as fundamental as the other MACHINE_* variables. It is currently just : a build option for libcrypto, so it could be handled like other build : options. So are you saying we should just toss a MACHINE_CPU ?= ${MACHINE_ARCH} in /etc/defaults/make.conf and be done with it. If we did this, with a sys.mk transition period, we'd solve the long term problem of too many things in sys.mk while still allowing for this to move forward. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message