From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 7 07:10:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA28098 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 07:10:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from codie04.ops.aol.com (codie04.ops.aol.com [152.163.8.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA28093 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 07:10:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ron@dc.infi.net) Received: from [152.163.101.11] by codie04.ops.aol.com with SMTP (1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA07006; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 10:09:40 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19971007100935.007c8bc0@shellhost.dc.infi.net> X-Sender: ron@shellhost.dc.infi.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 10:09:35 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Ron Steele Subject: Re: Is there anyhting better than uemacs In-Reply-To: <34395437.50B0@cableinet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 09:12 PM 10/6/97 +0000, Andy Pendry wrote: >Is there a better editor than uemacs for freeBSD? > >Cheers > >Andy Pendry > > I use Xemacs for stuff I am going to be working on for hours or days. For quick stuff, I find jove a pretty good emacs clone that is very fast to start up. It's been years since I even tryed to used uemacs, jove does the same thing much better IMO. Ron