From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Apr 17 08:10:02 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA08085 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 08:10:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA08074; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 08:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 08:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804171510.IAA08074@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs Cc: From: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: bin/6330: "make install" should not touch the obj tree Reply-To: Bruce Evans Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/6330; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Evans To: arnej@math.ntnu.no, bde@zeta.org.au, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Subject: Re: bin/6330: "make install" should not touch the obj tree Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 01:05:12 +1000 > > The first change should be obtained from -current too. > >Doesn't work, because -current makes use of the fact that the >original groff sources are in contrib/groff. I can't see how >it can be done the 'same way' using the sources as organized >in 2.2, at least. They are in contrib for 2.2 too :-). Only 2.1 has them in gnu. I think name conflicts can be handled in general by forcing use of an obj dir. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message