From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 15 08:24:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73896936 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7CE8FC08 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB8E40005 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:24:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 8021440010; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:24:00 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (h-45-105.a163.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC6D140005; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:23:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Y2FwG2WV6z8hVn; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:23:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id jXvV_uwlHrJk; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:23:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3Y2FwC4zPqz8hVm; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:23:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::3] (celes.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::3]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Y2FwC4dVcz9Ctj; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:23:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50A4A69B.7030200@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:23:55 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Ottevanger Subject: Re: [CFT] devel/binutils 2.23 References: <201211141445.qAEEjTXQ047896@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <50A3FCEF.9060204@freebsd.org> <50A4A5A2.2000902@beastielabs.net> In-Reply-To: <50A4A5A2.2000902@beastielabs.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:24:02 -0000 On 2012-11-15 09:19, Hans Ottevanger wrote: > On 11/14/12 21:19, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> On 11/14/12 15:45, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> It installed fine on ia64 and sparc64, both -current. >>> I don't know how to test. Please advise if there are >>> simple tests. >>> >>> Also, just to check, I manually deleted *orig files >>> from under files/ after applying the patch: >>> >>> # ls -al /usr/ports/devel/binutils/files/ >>> total 20 >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 12:58 . >>> drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Nov 14 13:00 .. >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 353 Nov 14 12:55 patch-bfd_Makefile.in >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 297 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_Makefile.in >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 471 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_script.cc >>> # >>> >>> because I think all files in this directory >>> will be used as patches, no matter the name. >>> Am I wrong? >>> >>> Anton >> >> Just compile test some binaries and see that they link and work ok. >> The .orig files are left over when running patch, and has to be removed. >> Sorry if I wasn't clear on that in my previous mail. >> Thanks for testing! >> Regards! > > Please be aware that apparently something went wrong with the release of > binutils-2.23 (see the discussion ending in: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00339.html > > though I doubt the glitches will affect your usage) and it has been > re-released as binutils-2.23.1. Maybe it is better to base the update if > the binutils port on that release. > I noticed that late last night, but haven't had time to update the patch yet. Thank you for pointing it out. Regards! -- Niclas