From owner-freebsd-doc Mon Jul 12 13:41: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C7E15262; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:40:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.2) id VAA04904; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:22:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:22:55 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp, nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk, jdp@polstra.com, doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk Subject: Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation Message-ID: <19990712212255.A4525@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> References: <19990628212827.C5662@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <19990705234732.R71138@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <3788952C.8F8C593D@sky.rim.or.jp> <199907120739.AAA68050@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <199907120739.AAA68050@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami on Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 12:39:53AM -0700 Organization: Nik at home, where there's nothing going on Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 12:39:53AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * From: Jun Kuriyama > > * (1) Copy directories in repository. > * (2) Operating tags in their files. (add "old" prefix to tags in copied > * files) > * (3) "cvs remove"ing old directory. (so they've gone into Attic) > > I also suggested (in a mail that Nik didn't respond to) changing tag > names from "release_*" to "RELEASE_*" in the new copies so we can have > a consistent set of tags in the new files (assuming we start using > "RELEASE_*" tag names from now on). Sorry, that must have passed me by. Yeah, as long as a consistent set of tags are used, I'm happy. That way other translation teams can use the same scheme. Deleting and re-applying tags is not a repository intensive operation is it (in terms of the bloat it would introduce)? N -- [intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed, non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs the links. -- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message