From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 28 10:32:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4760916A492 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henning@openbsd.org) Received: from smtp.bsws.de (smtp.bsws.de [80.86.183.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A953943CC2 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:32:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from henning@openbsd.org) Received: (qmail 13495 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2006 10:32:09 -0000 Received: from nudo.bsws.de ([80.86.183.71]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.bsws.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Nov 2006 10:32:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 10971 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Nov 2006 10:32:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20061128103208.27333.qmail@nudo.bsws.de> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:32:07 +0100 From: Henning Brauer To: Earl Lapus References: <604f76120611270203n3d065114vdbe8487cc04357e1@mail.gmail.com> <20061127125022.GA5690@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20061127142312.17227.qmail@nudo.bsws.de> <604f76120611271740g61c1a3a4pe8e9d37ab1df3f28@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <604f76120611271740g61c1a3a4pe8e9d37ab1df3f28@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-Key: 3A83DF32 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:41:59 +0000 Cc: Ryan Thomas McBride , Vasil Dimov , Henning Brauer , mlaier@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pfctl X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:32:49 -0000 * Earl Lapus [2006-11-28 02:41]: > I read that realtime must always be convex. That explains the checking. > However, linkshare and upperlimit can be either concave or convex. correct > If linkshare(lssc_xx) can be concave then we should allow lssc_m1 to be > less than lssc_m2 even if lssc_m1 is greater than zero. And this also > applies > to upperlimit (ulsc_xx). Is this correct? for a concave (m1 < m2), hfsc allows only m1 == 0 for simplicity. (had to check that with kenjiro :)