From owner-freebsd-elastic@freebsd.org Fri Feb 21 12:16:49 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-elastic@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF98325BFCE for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48P9S10GDBz4Ly3 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0104025BFCD; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: elastic@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BA325BFCC for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48P9Rz5zJpz4LwL; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1083128433; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:16:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-62-24-92-232.net.upcbroadband.cz [62.24.92.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7126C2842E; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:16:41 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: textproc/elasticsearch7 To: Greg Lewis , Andrei , elastic@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org References: <20200219140012.5e659502@azsupport.com> <66e3d945-4d70-23d0-7473-7712ec7c5a2b@quip.cz> <440f673d-95fc-be04-2c56-9674c53f9fda@eyesbeyond.com> From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <14fd744e-cc72-b544-08b7-3afdafde8cd1@quip.cz> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:16:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <440f673d-95fc-be04-2c56-9674c53f9fda@eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48P9Rz5zJpz4LwL X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz has no SPF policy when checking 94.124.105.4) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.04 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.85)[ip: (0.32), ipnet: 94.124.104.0/21(0.16), asn: 42000(3.67), country: CZ(0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quip.cz]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.991,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.105.124.94.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42000, ipnet:94.124.104.0/21, country:CZ]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[000.fbsd@quip.cz,SRS0=oA86=4J=quip.cz=000.fbsd@elsa.codelab.cz]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-elastic@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of ElasticSearch-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:16:49 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote on 2020/02/19 16:52: > Currently there are no beats or kibana ports for 7.x.  The beats port > means moving the current beats port to beats6 and creating a beats7. > The kibana 7.x port likely needs someone with some more Node expertise > to comment on the PR, since last I checked it required a specific > version of Node that the ports system has passed over.  7.6.x may have > changed that but I haven't looked yet. Kibana is always bundled with some version of Node but sometimes in the past our Kibana in ports had dependency on different version of Node and it worked. I unpacked kibana-7.6.-linux-x86_64.tg.gz and found version info of bundled Node in node/include/node/node_version.h #define NODE_MAJOR_VERSION 10 #define NODE_MINOR_VERSION 18 #define NODE_PATCH_VERSION 0 It seems like 10.18.0 which is what we currently have in ports tree www/node10 (it is 10.18.1 but I don't think it will be a big problem) And the same www/node10 is used for kibana6 port anyway. But I am not using Kibana anymore and have a very little spare time - I cannot do Kibana 7.6 port now. Miroslav Lachman