Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:43:50 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Frederic Culot <culot@FreeBSD.org>, Eric <freebsdports@chillibear.com>, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/rubygem-mail Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20110727004348.GE1441@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <4E2F5CA2.7090107@FreeBSD.org> References: <201107251146.p6PBkSLU027484@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E2DF92D.9020601@FreeBSD.org> <4E2EF2AD.4020709@p6m7g8.com> <4E2F5CA2.7090107@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:32:34 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/26/2011 10:00, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > Normally, I 100% agree with Doug. But we're not only talking about ruby > > here, we're talking about rails. I hard a hard time naming gems that > > don't do this crap. I almost replied yesterday and said add an option, > > but IMHO either way is fine, and not worth diddling over. > > There are at least 3 possible ways to handle this situation: > > 1. Force the dependency I hope we can avoid this. > 2a. Have an OPTION and error out if the user chooses WITHOUT_FOO and foo > is installed. For what (little) it's worth, my vote is for 2a. -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110727004348.GE1441>