From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 14:16:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AF116A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A63043D3F; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:16:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from dougb.net ([24.130.160.161]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <200403242216300130019r12e>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:16:32 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:16:30 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040324141407.F88409@qbhto.arg> References: Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" cc: "cvs-src@FreeBSD.org" cc: "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/doscmd AsyncIO.c README.booting_dos bios.c callback.c callback.h cmos.c com.h config.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:16:33 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I think most people heard "tjr assented to waiting" as the end of the > discussion. > > remember emails can get re-orderred.. This is where a good threaded mail reader helps. :) Seriously though, is there a strong, well-reasoned objection to the action by des, or can we let this one go? As I said, my opinion is biased, but I don't see any harm here on the tech side, nor do I see any bad faith on des' part. I'll step out now and let people respond. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection