From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 20:01:32 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB5910656E1
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:01:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from usgrishin@samaradom.ru)
Received: from mx1.samaradom.ru (june.samaradom.ru [85.113.63.225])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26638FC0C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from usgrishin@samaradom.ru)
Received: from [10.62.116.37] (port=65262 helo=[192.168.0.15])
	by mx1.samaradom.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <usgrishin@samaradom.ru>) id 1LNsou-00055t-JP
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:49:24 +0400
Message-ID: <4970C86E.6050900@samaradom.ru>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:48:30 +0400
From: Yuriy Grishin <usgrishin@samaradom.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [www/sams] why did commiter bump PORTREVISION ? Now it's broken.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: uzgrishin@mail.ru
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:01:33 -0000

Hello
I'm the maintainer of the port www/sams.

In early of December 2008 the developer released new version of SAMS -- 
1.0.4
I tried to take most of users comments and sent pr 
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129816

Few days afterwards miwi wrote that he couldn't extract my diff (may be 
because I had sent it using windows+seamonkey?)
I upload files to my homepage and submitted follow-up.
A few days later I saw that the port has been updated, BUT:
1) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129816 the pr is open (is 
it normal?)
2) commiter bumped PORTREVISION and it leads to port corruption because

-------------------Makefile-------------------
....
DISTNAME=       ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
....
-------------------Makefile-------------------
thus it searches sams-1.0.3 instead of sams-1.0.4 ==> hash check will fail

Questions :

1.Should have I say in the pr that it was not only has been updated by 
me but also by the developer?
2.What should I do now?