Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:48:18 -0400
From:      mikel king <mikel.king@olivent.com>
To:        FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
Subject:   Re: Dennis Ritchie has died. A suggestion
Message-ID:  <4960302B-0685-4AAD-80FF-5A4BC388058B@olivent.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111014134123.GC83001@guilt.hydra>
References:  <20111013234643.GQ14162@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <201110141220.p9ECKsUt039323@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20111014134123.GC83001@guilt.hydra>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:20:54AM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>>=20
>> I think it's fair to say it would be 'Ritchie-deserved'.              =
                                                                         =
                               =20
>=20
> I'm conflicted about whether that's a good pun or a bad pun.           =
                                                                         =
                                =20
>=20
>=20
>>=20
>> Consider this another opinion in favor of the proposal.               =
                                                                         =
                               =20
>=20
> Y'know, I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to post obituaries on    =
                                                                         =
                                =20
> official FreeBSD related Websites, but if it is, I can think of no =
better                                                                   =
                                    =20
> time than now -- in honor of Dennis Ritchie, one of the most important =
                                                                         =
                                =20
> figures in all of Unix development, influential beyond what anyone is  =
                                                                         =
                                =20
> likely to fully realized even outside of the Unix lineage itself.      =
                                                                         =
                                =20
>=20
> Yeah, I've just convinced myself.  Even if it is generally not =
considered                                                               =
                                        =20
> appropriate, I think making an exception in this very exceptional case =
is                                                                       =
                                =20
> difficult to resist.  I'll offer my voice in the chorus of support as  =
                                                                         =
                                =20
> well.                                                                  =
                                                                         =
                                =20


Has anyone from the the project weighed in on this yet?


Regards,
Mikel King
BSD News Network
http://bsdnews.net
skype: mikel.king
http://twitter.com/mikelking






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4960302B-0685-4AAD-80FF-5A4BC388058B>