From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Jun 29 23:27:29 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE8637B785
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 23:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 137uGT-000P1S-00; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:27:01 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org>
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: mergemaster: Change in description of envar handling 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:15:43 MST."
             <395B843F.6274C58D@gorean.org> 
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:27:01 +0200
Message-ID: <96189.962346421@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:15:43 MST, Doug Barton wrote:

> 	It's neither, it's the absolute truth. What might be helpful is an
> expansion of that message to include more details about why it's true. I
> will work on that tonight. It should be easy enough to do that, and
> update for less being in the base as well. 

Yeah.  Something that explained that mergemaster was using a restrictive
PATH would attain the goal I'm punting at.

>       So you don't want to argue the merits, you just want me to do
> what you want me to do?

Wouldn't _that_ be dandy? :-)

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message