From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 19 11:50:17 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FE11065693
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:50:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9AF8FC15
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:50:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MzqkV-0007vV-SY
	for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:50:03 +0200
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:50:03 +0200
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:50:03 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:44:59 +0200
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <hbhjfg$sjk$2@ger.gmane.org>
References: <78DB4AE8EF5F4A1EBD3992D7404B2725@china.huawei.com><d763ac660910180755i7f6fd3c7q8578bfed11978b9d@mail.gmail.com><ee9f3b480910181305x5c8661a7mb7bfdd2ddd0a267d@mail.gmail.com>	<d763ac660910181836p45aedc37v1c77f5e96b6df13b@mail.gmail.com>
	<EE345038BF2D4A17A8D6B64F5B451292@multiplay.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090928)
In-Reply-To: <EE345038BF2D4A17A8D6B64F5B451292@multiplay.co.uk>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Comparison of FreeBSD/Linux TCP Throughput performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:50:17 -0000

Steven Hartland wrote:
> Try with something like this, which is the standard set we use on our
> file serving machines.
> 
> net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
> kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216
> net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=16777216
> net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=16777216

16 MB network buffers? What kind of % impact do you see from them?