From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 15:23:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E836106566C for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ricardo.meb.jesus@gmail.com) Received: from gate.criticalsoftware.com (gate.criticalsoftware.com [62.28.132.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256BD8FC14 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.98] (unknown [192.168.1.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gate.criticalsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A2F2284C6; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:23:07 +0000 (WET) Message-ID: <4BA0F3DD.8010604@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:23:09 +0000 From: Ricardo Jesus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=D4=CF=CE_=EB=CC=C5=D3=D3?= References: <3f1c29e71003170656u1b932fd2v37f5062440653e3b@mail.gmail.com> <0b9982274818d454f23bc89ac74d30f5@asterix.area536.com> <3f1c29e71003170745u55a4fad2rd8c6f39d02fa968f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3f1c29e71003170745u55a4fad2rd8c6f39d02fa968f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Bas v.d. Wiel" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which version of FreeBSD is it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ricardo.m.jesus@criticalsoftware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:23:10 -0000 On 17/03/2010 14:45, =E1=CE=D4=CF=CE =EB=CC=C5=D3=D3 wrote: > That is what I suspected for. > > What is the most safe way to upgrade it, remembering that this is produ= ction > server and I have to keep it working properly? > > 6.2-RC1 -> 6.2 RELEASE -> 7.2 RELEASE -> 8.0 RELEASE, or somehow in = this > style? > > > > 2010/3/17 Bas v.d. Wiel > >> >> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:56:20 +0300, =E1=CE=D4=CF=CE =EB=CC=C5=D3=D3 >> wrote: >>> I have the server that's running FreeBSD for the last few years, but = I >> saw >>> it only year ago and know nothing about when and how was installed >> FreeBSD >>> on it. >>> >>> # uname -a >>> FreeBSD myhost.net 6.2-RC1 FreeBSD 6.2-RC1 #4: Fri Mar 5 01:37:03 MS= K >>> 2010 root@myhost.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERN amd64 >>> >>> Is it RELEASE, STABLE or what? >> >> It is what it says it is: 6.2-RC1, meaning Release Candidate 1. That's= a >> development/test version. If this is a production system it would be a= very >> good idea to replace it with the current 8.0 RELEASE, which will give = you >> at least proper patch maintenance. >> >> Bas >> > > > It should be 6.2-RC1 -> 6.2 -> 6.4 -> 7.2 -> 8.0 Dont' think freebsd-update supports 6.2 (AFAIR it supports from 6.4=20 onwards), so you probably will have to use csup.