From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jul 10 22:56:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA00418 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 22:56:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (garbanzo@spain-26.ppp.hooked.net [206.169.228.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA00413 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 22:56:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA00758; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 22:57:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 22:57:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex X-Sender: garbanzo@zippy.dyn.ml.org To: Julian Elischer cc: current Subject: Re: TESTERS NEEDED: Softupdates looks Very good. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Julian Elischer wrote: > Thanks. A commit yestaerday fixed one of the known problems. > that leases us with only the 'hard to reproduce panic'. > > I'd say that if people have been hanging back from using soft updates for > safety reasons, then it's possibly reached the stage where it's more risk > to your filesystem to NOT use soft updates... :-) What about on root filesystems? - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message