From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 7 8:46:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from stennis.ca.sandia.gov (stennis.ca.sandia.gov [146.246.243.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EB715298 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:46:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@stennis.ca.sandia.gov) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by stennis.ca.sandia.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA05315; Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906071546.IAA05315@stennis.ca.sandia.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.0 04/14/1999 To: Arabian Cc: bmah@california.sandia.gov, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routers and such In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Jun 1999 19:30:38 +0300." <3.0.6.32.19990604193038.007caa00@qatar.net.qa> From: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Url: http://www.ca.sandia.gov/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1564999985P"; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 07 Jun 1999 08:46:27 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_-1564999985P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Arabian wrote: > >Without some more details, it's difficult to answer your question. For > example, >what kind of services are you providing? > > I'm runing an IRC server. > > >Where are the clients? > > IRC users. What I was getting at here was that if the clients are far away, network-wise, that the latency added by an extra hop through a router is probably negligible by comparison. (We're talking something on the order of a millisecond or so here, assuming that your situation isn't pathologically bad.) > >Are the networks 10Mbps or 100Mbps? > > 100 Mpbs Full Duplex. > > >Is the router doing anything other than routing packets? > > Just routing packets, and as firewall to proect the server connected to it > from attacks ICMPs ...etc. I asked this to see if the router is heavily loaded. Sounds like it's not. > There is no performance problem actually, I just wanted to make sure I wont > have it on the future, avoiding the problem before it happenes better than > solving it after problems jumped. :) OK. It sounds to me like you're doing OK with what you've got. I'm sure someone else will correct me if there's reason to believe otherwise. Bruce. --==_Exmh_-1564999985P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBN1vpUqjOOi0j7CY9AQEdrAP/dVwNSHc3ZWstFX1gpG05eLVv3NfKQJzI oQ6f4ejcq/JGb8lUvKxUUUyiM0ipKJIfJl03+yLPVhZuTrDlhIv1VrEemAvy/hI0 FPJP4RDkuOpn/HBstquUZwqls1o/TfJbnRyi4LwpHCONemAHeGJ+FeaD9Ey+24ZF l1phjlFaK3s= =LRjn -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==_Exmh_-1564999985P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message