From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 28 17:58:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5545133E; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:58:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32050B5A; Tue, 28 May 2013 17:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B602B99F; Tue, 28 May 2013 13:58:28 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: "Dag-Erling SmXXrgrav" Subject: Re: svn commit: r251058 - head Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:00:35 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p25; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201305280952.r4S9qShX012991@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201305280952.r4S9qShX012991@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201305281100.35435.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 28 May 2013 13:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:58:31 -0000 On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:52:28 am Dag-Erling SmXXrgrav wrote: > Author: des > Date: Tue May 28 09:52:28 2013 > New Revision: 251058 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/251058 > > Log: > During buildkernel, print a banner before building modules. > > Modified: > head/Makefile.inc1 Does this honor 'makeoptions NO_MODULES=yes' in the kernel config? That sets NO_MODULES=yes in the generated Makefile, not in the environment seen by the make instance running this makefile. My guess is that this would result in 'make buildkernel' calling 'make modules-all' but 'modules-all' wouldn't be defined as a valid target? -- John Baldwin