From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Thu Feb 18 22:39:42 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA371AAC1C8
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl)
Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D205FB4
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl)
Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4])
 by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u1IMZkD8056356;
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:35:46 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl)
Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:35:46 +0100
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:35:46 +0100
From: Alphons van Werven <freebsd@skysmurf.nl>
To: Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: category customports
Message-ID: <20160218223546.GA56276@spectrum.skysmurf.nl>
References: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56C643D7.2010607@utanet.at>
X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:39:42 -0000


--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:

> But this could be overwritten with the next update.
[snip]
> But this could also [sic] overwritten.

You're using portsnap for your updates, I presume? Subversion will not
override local changes (at least not without asking first). I have a tree
here that contains local ports and locally modified ports. That's exactly
why I use SVN instead of portsnap.

You might get similar results if you use Git to update your tree, I don't
know about that.

HTH,

AvW

--=20
A.J. "Fonz" van Werven
mailsig: Ob technicas difficultates, lux in fine cuniculum non operatur.

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=JbIY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--