From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 15:18:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2241065880 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rewt.org.uk) Received: from hosted.mx.as41113.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:b70:201:2::22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC1A8FC08 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.11.44] (unknown [91.208.177.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lists@rewt.org.uk) by hosted.mx.as41113.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E79D322814 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F64AB3B.9030806@rewt.org.uk> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:18:19 +0000 From: Joe Holden User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: msk/Yukon issues since 9.0-REL X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:18:27 -0000 Hi guys, I've upgraded to 9.0-REL from RC3 (I think) and the previous workarounds I've used for msk/Yukon II problems don't seem to work anymore: rc.conf: ifconfig_msk0="inet 192.168.201.2/30 -lro -tso -vlanhwfilter -vlanhwtag" pciconf: mskc0@pci0:7:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x81e6104d chip=0x435111ab rev=0x15 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Marvell Technology Group Ltd.' device = '88E8036 PCI-E Fast Ethernet Controller' class = network subclass = ethernet I seem to get the usual error: msk0: watchdog timeout msk0: prefetch unit stuck? msk0: initialization failed: no memory for Rx buffers MSI(-X) is disabled but it doesn't seem to make any difference.... Is there anything I can try to either debug or "fix" it? Thanks, J