From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  2 11:45:48 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF94106564A;
	Fri,  2 Apr 2010 11:45:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw)
Received: from mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw [140.131.149.3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483628FC16;
	Fri,  2 Apr 2010 11:45:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 0BD964B7826; Fri,  2 Apr 2010 19:27:37 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:27:36 +0800
From: Denny Lin <dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw>
To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
Message-ID: <20100402112736.GB4611@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw>
References: <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org>
	<20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org>
	<4BB58AA6.1040600@yandex.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BB58AA6.1040600@yandex.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Results of BIND RFC
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:45:48 -0000

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:50AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> >While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not
> >sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision.  How hard
> >it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the
> >critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving
> >the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port?
> 
> Hi, All.
> 
> I'm agree with Stas. If it is not so hard to maintain "bind-tools" in the 
> base,
> It is very useful to still having them in base system.

+1 here. Dig and some of the other tools are extremely useful and
important, so it would be nice if they were in the base system instead
of a separate port.

-- 
Denny Lin