Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:30:18 -0500 From: Jerry <gesbbb@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba 3.2 & FreeBSD Message-ID: <20090210073018.4f0c9399@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <49916D64.701@fxclub.org> References: <49913469.6040400@fxclub.org> <991123400902100003k6877057ehc2f0eb71a504d3ed@mail.gmail.com> <49916D64.701@fxclub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/MkYqB76KCfDq_uZFXa8j0lk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:04:52 +0300 Proskurin Kirill <proskurin-kv@fxclub.org> wrote: >Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Proskurin Kirill >>> >>> Just wondering - why samba 3.2+ is not in a ports? >> net/samba3-devel ?? > >Oh. But why it is "devel"? >Samba 3.3 is officially stable. Have you tried contacting the port maintainer? timur@FreeBSD.org --=20 Jerry gesbbb@yahoo.com "Surely you can't be serious." "I am serious, and don't call me Shirley." --Sig_/MkYqB76KCfDq_uZFXa8j0lk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmRc2MACgkQBvaKIJWWCO1+/QCeKgLAS/AWe7ABlNWKSFuZvI9b HTEAn1U6MeEtoWeoPqgQWAmnFmHjgGP8 =0qW3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/MkYqB76KCfDq_uZFXa8j0lk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090210073018.4f0c9399>