From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sun May 6 16:02:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B69CFBE563; Sun, 6 May 2018 16:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2B587A6EB; Sun, 6 May 2018 16:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id A28AF1B2B; Sun, 6 May 2018 16:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 16:02:20 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Kurt Jaeger , Koichiro Iwao , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r469188 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg_replace Message-ID: <20180506160220.GE79630@FreeBSD.org> References: <201805061015.w46AF3HQ070595@repo.freebsd.org> <20180506102749.GA58637@FreeBSD.org> <20180506103420.GW25490@fc.opsec.eu> <20180506105012.GA39087@FreeBSD.org> <20180506151022.63wom7xgw6doi4dk@ivaldir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180506151022.63wom7xgw6doi4dk@ivaldir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 16:02:21 -0000 On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 05:10:22PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 10:50:12AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 12:34:20PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > ... > > > There was a problem if the pkg-list stayed in PLIST_FILES > > > (the build in poudriere failed with a signal 6 in make package). > > > > > > Koichiro is working to reproduce/report this, until then... > > > > *facepalm*. This poudriere-driven development is more and more > > disturbing. [...] > > If you read it carefully this is not a "poudriere-driven development" > as it shows a real bug happening to anyone running make package. > > And most of the poudriere-driven development as you call them which are > disturbing are in fact real bugs in the ports, and nothing poudriere only. OK sorry I guess that was a bit too harsh. It's just that folks recently seem to jump the gun and aggressively make changes, backout changes, or sometimes even delete ports because they don't build in poudriere and/or preventing it to start, without giving much of an explanation, and that's kind of worrisome IMHO. :-/ ./danfe