From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 06:16:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1156116A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:16:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5449243D46 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 06:16:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2UEGTFZ052186; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:16:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2UEGTV1052184; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:16:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:16:28 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040330141627.GA51918@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , current@freebsd.org References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330105948.GA48082@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330111059.GA48428@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.24.0.7; VDF 6.24.0.75 (host: pobrecita.freebsd.ru) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to BSD.*.dist X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:16:36 -0000 On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:09:02PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > So what *is* the supported way to create and populate ${PREFIX}? As you can see in bsd.port.mk, it is make install-mtree > and why didn't you protest this change when it was discussed on the > lists? the conclusion of that discussion was "BSD.*.dist doesn't list > symlinks because we thought mtree couldn't handle them" I do that already. Kris ask me in private message about problems symlinks can cause in BSD.*.dist. I explain that either -P or -L will be broken. He resend my answer to interested parties. Apparently, you was not among them. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/