From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 4 22:24:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (s205m7.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC05B1553A for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 22:24:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id WAA67013 for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 4 May 1999 22:24:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199905050524.WAA67013@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: traceroute patch In-Reply-To: <199905031736.KAA10201@bubba.whistle.com> from Archie Cobbs at "May 3, 99 10:36:28 am" To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 22:24:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Archie Cobbs writes: > I have this patch for traceroute that adds the ability to send > packets with an arbitrary IP protocol number, instead of just TCP > and UDP. This is mainly useful to see if some router between points > A and B is blocking packets based on IP protocol number. > > I sent it to "traceroute@ee.lbl.gov" but got no response. > > Is this something people might be interested in? Is it worth committing? > We've found it useful on occasion. > > ftp://ftp.whistle.com/pub/archie/misc/traceroute.patch Hmm.. since nobody replied, I'll try a more provocative question.. :-) Does anyone object to me committing this patch? Thanks, -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message