From owner-cvs-all  Mon May 28  9:47:27 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B589F37B423; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@[206.40.252.115])
	by relay.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4SGlGl46846;
	Mon, 28 May 2001 09:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f4SGlDL16134;
	Mon, 28 May 2001 09:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:47:13 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Dima Dorfman <dd@freebsd.org>,
	cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/jot Makefile jot.c
Message-ID: <20010528094712.A16116@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105282121480.1612-100000@besplex.bde.org> <52963.991050595@axl.fw.uunet.co.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <52963.991050595@axl.fw.uunet.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:49:55PM +0200
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:49:55PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Bleh.  I think this is stupid.  The compiler we use shouldn't force
> us into unnecessary source work-arounds.  Not providing a forward
> declaration for main() is _always_ okay because it's _never_ called by
> any other subroutine in the module.
> 
> David, how would you feel about a local hack to gcc for this?

W/o really thinking about it, I'd have to say I'd have to see the diff
and which file it patches before commenting.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message