Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:48:56 -0700
From:      rick norman <rick.norman@lmco.com>
To:        rizzo@iciri.org
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: dummynet stats
Message-ID:  <3BD9B018.89D07BF1@lmco.com>
References:  <3BD99BE8.F02EA873@lmco.com> <20011026112547.B67858@iguana.aciri.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I guess my question then is why did I need to stop the stream and restart
it before it would show up in the pipe?  It seems that if I repeatedly flush,
delete pipes, reinstall pipes, without stopping the data stream, that I get
into
a state where no data will register in the pipes until I stop and restart the
stream.

Rick

Luigi Rizzo wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:22:48AM -0700, rick norman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I seem to get inconsistent outputs from the same dummynet
> > stat query.  Following is the output from two different queries :
> >
> > bash-2.05$
> > bash-2.05$ ipfw pipe 3 show
> > 00003: unlimited    0 ms  2048 B 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail
> >     mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000
> > bash-2.05$
> > bash-2.05$ ipfw pipe 3 show
> > 00003: unlimited    0 ms  2048 B 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail
> >     mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000
> > BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes
> > Pkt/Byte Drp
> >   0 icmp      127.0.31.1/0          127.0.31.1/0     3139  1695060  0
> > 0   0
> > bash-2.05$
> >
> > The only difference between the two dumps is that a flood ping
> > was stopped and then restated.
> > In both cases, the same ruleset and dummynet pipes were in effect.  I
> > am using flood pings for a data stream in both cases.  The first dump
> > is after a flush and reinstallation of the pipe rules. The data stream
> > was
> > running while the rules were being installed.  The ping was then stopped
> >
> > and restarted followed by the second stat query.   My question is why
> > didn't
> > the stats reflect the stream until it had been stopped and restarted ?
>
> i actually doubt that any traffic went throught he pipe before
> the first "ipfw pipe show" or you would have seen it.
> packets are accounted for immediately as they go through.
>
>         cheers
>         luigi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BD9B018.89D07BF1>