Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:23:16 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: with the cvs history? trying to help INDEX builds. Message-ID: <20120120132316.GA88509@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F196918.4050309@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F177264.3090708@freebsd.org> <4F17DB1C.6080503@infracaninophile.co.uk> <CADLo83-WtVmyGHM=O4FbTNbDy9h=A1t111bP6eYc%2BTL8-RGmuA@mail.gmail.com> <4F193FD5.8070208@infracaninophile.co.uk> <CADLo83-n_C9h-eLSMZ%2B23s_piocyNuTy_VsNxkKK2RZAA_wG-Q@mail.gmail.com> <4F196918.4050309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 05:16:08AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/20/2012 04:53, Chris Rees wrote: > > Occasionally someone runs an exp- for sparc64 (lol) etc. > > ... which given the overwhelming lack of users for this platform is > almost certainly a waste of resources. how about ia64? > > They use TRYBROKEN to test packages marked BROKEN, but ONLY_FOR_ARCHS sets > > IGNORE. > > > > Ports marked this way (incorrectly) will never be tested, and thus never > > marked fixed. > > I think this is a red herring. Users who want to see those ports work on > those platforms are either going to put the effort in, or not. They > aren't going to be deterred by what make options we choose. this is true. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120120132316.GA88509>