From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 2 08:24:41 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA09433 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:24:41 -0800 Received: from dataplex.net (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA09427 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 1995 08:24:39 -0800 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by dataplex.net with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b8); Wed, 1 Feb 1995 12:18:47 -0600 X-Sender: wacky@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 1 Feb 1995 12:18:49 -0600 To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: Re: sup: Ok, I'm gonna do it. Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Topologically equivalent to: .... >Except the second approach doesn't require as much local disk. I agree that they are functionally equivalent. The important step that is presently missing is that access which requires the consistency checking before releasing changes to the publicly accessable sources. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net