From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Nov 3 16:33:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3EA1506A for ; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 16:33:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA18608 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 01:32:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id BAA90402 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Nov 1999 01:32:40 +0100 (MET) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id EFC2115132; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 16:32:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDFE1CD776; Wed, 3 Nov 1999 16:32:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 16:32:23 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Amancio Hasty Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solaris terminology In-Reply-To: <199911030800.AAA33669@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > BTW: SGI is supposed to be working on Linux to make it more scalable across > multiple processors . The figure that I heard is that they were aiming for 100 > processors or so . > > Since SGIs work is supposed to be "open-source" perhaps someone can > dig up what SGI is up to ... I don't believe SGI has actually released any code yet at all (except for OpenVault), despite their much-vaunted "commitment to open source". Kris ---- Cthulhu for President! For when you're tired of choosing the _lesser_ of two evils.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message