From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 25 20:35:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA03688 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp20.portal.net.au [202.12.71.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA03683 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 20:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.smith.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA00500; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 13:02:45 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199709260332.NAA00500@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Andrew Gordon cc: Mike Smith , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATAPI Zip challenge : aftermath In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:02:30 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 13:02:43 +0930 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Fri, 26 Sep 1997, Mike Smith wrote: > > The replacement arrived today, and it exhibits the same basic > > behaviour; ie. it no longer looks like an IDE disk at all. It _does_ > > respond to the ATAPI probe, however they appear to have removed the IDE > > emulation in current models. > > > > This of course means that you can't _boot_ from them anymore, which is > > a royal pain. > > Does it look enough like an ATAPI CD drive that a BIOS with boot-from-CD > support would attempt to boot it? Not enough for the AMI BIOS at any rate; it complains that it's "Atapi incompatible", which I think means "it's not a CDROM". mike