Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Sep 2001 18:54:15 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        "Todd C. Miller" <Todd.Miller@courtesan.com>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, security@FreeBSD.ORG, audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Fwd: Multiple vendor 'Taylor UUCP' problems.
Message-ID:  <20010908185415.A5619@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <200109090120.f891KvM14677@xerxes.courtesan.com>; from Todd.Miller@courtesan.com on Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 07:20:56PM -0600
References:  <5.1.0.14.0.20010908153417.0286b4b8@192.168.0.12> <200109082103.f88L3fK29117@earth.backplane.com> <20010908154617.A73143@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010908170257.A82082@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010908174304.A88816@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010909045226.A33654@nagual.pp.ru> <20010908180848.A94567@xor.obsecurity.org> <200109090120.f891KvM14677@xerxes.courtesan.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 07:20:56PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> In message <20010908180848.A94567@xor.obsecurity.org>
> 	so spake Kris Kennaway (kris):
>=20
> > The vulnerability involves uucp being made to run arbitrary commands
> > as the uucp user through specifying a custom configuration file - see
> > bugtraq.  There may be other problems resulting from user-specified
> > configuration files.  I don't have time to go through the code and fix
> > up the revocation of privileges right now..in the meantime, this
> > prevents the root exploit where a user replaces a uucp-owned binary
> > like uustat, which is called daily by /etc/periodic.
>=20
> Is there really any reason to run uustat as root?  Why not just run
> it as user uucp via su?  For that matter, running non-root owned
> executables from daily seems like a really bad idea.

Yeah, thats probably a good change to make.  However the uucp
vulnerability still lets e.g. arbitrary users read/modify uucp spool
data, create files, access the uucp:dialer devices, etc.

Kris

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7msvHWry0BWjoQKURAgOsAKDUaW67EnSmSBPj/wNhDf1GTr3YJgCfUhp2
l39v0hcNcqdhOFtbvN3UZnE=
=m8Gv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010908185415.A5619>