From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 15:36:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48B916A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:36:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from resmo.com (resmo.com [204.202.11.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7325143D48 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:36:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gstewart@bonivet.net) X-Resmo-Authenticated-User: [] X-Resmo-Msg-Submitted-By: mail.bonivet.net [81.56.185.133] Received: from dragonfly.bonivet.net (mail.bonivet.net [81.56.185.133]) by resmo.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j21FaInt015617 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:36:19 GMT Received: from dragonfly.bonivet.net (localhost.bonivet.net [127.0.0.1]) by dragonfly.bonivet.net (8.13.3/8.13.1) with SMTP id j21FaCa2000702 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gstewart@bonivet.net) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:11 +0100 From: Godwin Stewart To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050301163611.3aa610cf.gstewart@bonivet.net> In-Reply-To: <20050301023025.U50530@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20050301002139.2F2E05D07@ptavv.es.net> <20050301023025.U50530@mail.chesapeake.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.3 (GTK+ 2.4.14; i386-unknown-freebsd5.3) X-Face: #T;eJks=B[`71qrwp`l6BW8xI&hP8S*4Kd%e?8o"rL02ZYf"rWa41l83a)L,*; S).Ukq$U% II{-z#5%i&X8"%{$)ZWmE7WBDF)?wK1^7]u9T;@jqdZo?IT!d-L`!@&vW)F_1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Xorg 6.8.1 and SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:36:20 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson wrote: > Is the process that does the FFT in kernel, niced, or rtprio'd? last pid: 93131; load averages: 0.96, 0.49, 0.24 up 0+05:18:20 15:29:47 48 processes: 2 running, 46 sleeping CPU states: 99.6% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% id= le Mem: 174M Active, 94M Inact, 86M Wired, 14M Cache, 48M Buf, 2564K Free Swap: 743M Total, 180K Used, 743M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 93124 godwin 121 0 33288K 23836K RUN 2:22 13.72% 13.72% audacity WCPU and CPU climb to about 20%, drop to 0 during disk I/O, then start climbing again. Note that this is with SCHED_4BSD. I'd need to recompile a kernel to get similar information for ULE/PREEMPTION. fx: goes off and compiles a new kernel and comes back when it's done... Looks like I spoke too soon. The system is now perfectly stable and usable with ULE. The problems I was having with ULE were on 5.3-STABLE. I'm now on 5.4-PRE. Were there significant changes to the kernel in between? > Can you give me any information on the means by which you transfer data > from a cassette to your pc? Straightforward audio connection from the amp's line out to the sound card's line in. The FFT filtering isn't performed on the fly BTW. I use audacity to grab the audio and then work on it after it's "in the box". - --=20 G. Stewart - gstewart@bonivet.net All those who believe in telekinesis, raise my hand. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCJIvrK5oiGLo9AcYRAtGOAKDOj+vzbIR8r8/Ei9Yzo/9abPKmDACdHcIY pcHHJuEsBDYQzJhRkleWzDQ=3D =3DOXpK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----