From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 23 11:58:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA06783 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 11:58:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nak.myhouse.com (nak.myhouse.com [209.70.45.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA06764 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 11:58:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) Received: from localhost (zoonie@localhost) by nak.myhouse.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA00344; Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:57:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from zoonie@myhouse.com) X-Authentication-Warning: nak.myhouse.com: zoonie owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 14:57:00 -0500 (EST) From: zoonie To: Bo Fussing cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Private IP Addressing on Routers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org i think you mean RFC 1597, the answer is yes we have and it works fine as long as you are careful and don't advertise them to the world. the other thing you should know is that the RFC has been updated and 1597 is now obsolete. check RFC 1918 for the latest....... On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Bo Fussing wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone ever tried to use private IP addresses as described by RFC 1497 > on internal interfaces of routers, for example on the interfaces at two > ends of a leased line? > > Bo > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Bo Fussing Gateway Internet Ltd. > Tel +852 2963-7359 Fax +852 2963-7353 URL http://www.gateway.net.hk > PGP fingerprint = D7 9F ED 1D E5 B9 62 4F 77 BC D1 33 5B 4E 95 81 > For PGP ID & Signature mail empty message to bmf-pgp@gateway.net.hk > >