From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 02:38:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE0A16A419; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B921B13C46B; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6P2cTO2001477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l6P2cTAJ001476; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:38:28 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200707192341.59940@aldan> <200707201317.32746@aldan> <20070722133553.619a5eab@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <20070722133553.619a5eab@deskjail> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, scf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: something wrong with Linux on 6.2-stable/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:38:31 -0000 On нед╕ля 22 липень 2007, Alexander Leidinger wrote: = Ok, I removed this part from the patch... did you test the above = regardless of the failed hunk? If not, please do. Just rebooted -- same problem... :( I wish, Linux was available as a module on amd64 -- at least, I would not have to reboot to try every little patch. = Lack of a small test which exhibits it and no intent on my side to = break the law by acquiring a copy of a commercial game from you makes = this way of handling it necessary. You would not be breaking a law by downloading a game for testing purposes. This is also why I did not just post a link to it, but offered you to contact me privately. (Not to mention, the game's publisher -- Loki -- has gone out of business about 5 years ago.) = I also don't have a -stable system on which I can test this. You could test on -current, just to see, if the problem is fixed there -- it is (far) easier for you to do that, than for me to upgrade my only system to (the half-baked) -current. = And investigating bugs to some extend is the users responsibility. You = (as a developer) can not reproduce everything in an open source project = yourself, so you need feedback from users which cooperate. Of course. And I provided plenty of feedback. But you are asking me to rebuild the kernel and reboot (my main system) several times, which is a rather burdensome excercise. It is far easier you to download the program and try it. Yours, -mi