From nobody Mon Oct 23 15:06:01 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SDdn02yQyz4y9JW for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SDdmz5krHz4H7c; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 39NF62Kx035058; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:06:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 39NF61wq035057; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:06:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202310231506.39NF61wq035057@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 14.0-BETA5 Now Available In-Reply-To: To: Ed Maste Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:06:01 -0700 (PDT) CC: =?UTF-8?Q?Gy=C3=B6rgy_P=C3=A1sztor?= , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[fbsd]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4SDdmz5krHz4H7c > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 13:46, Gy?rgy P?sztor wrote: > > > >> I am interested in looking for a way to make Ventoy support more > >> reliable, but that will not happen for 14.0. > > > > Is it depending on Ventoy? > > Yes, Ventoy needs to be updated for newer FreeBSD releases. For more info, see: > https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.php?tid=1805 > https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/issues/7#issuecomment-1493237303 This is a regression of forms... I have been using ventoy to boot FreeBSD since 12 or so and this is the first I have heard of a failure to boot FreeBSD with Ventoy, so my ask is, what changed in FreeBSD that broke it booting in Ventoy? Note I do use Ventoy in EFI mode, perhaps that is why I have no issues? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org