Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:09:27 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade - Deprecated? Message-ID: <CADLo83_JUrBkRcrw_FZBhre39dgbNmOE-V385A8jbaSwecEOcw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F86A87D.7030309@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F863615.80203@shatow.net> <CAF6rxgn5O8LvUAL_EBdz0ji91ZE=ayX-fJVoNbx01YxoMCAWJg@mail.gmail.com> <4F864EEE.4010508@p6m7g8.com> <4F869CD2.2040702@onetel.com> <CADLo83-OdYBCXd=woeP2xwxb9sXcrAwMB3q2QGNRQkvnD2=R_w@mail.gmail.com> <4F86A87D.7030309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 April 2012 10:03, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 12/04/2012 10:57, Chris Rees wrote: >>> I'm only a lurker and lowly user but could I humbly request that portma= nager >>> > is brought back into use? It's simple to use and does what it does ex= tremely >>> > well and without fuss. I think the fact that it still "just works" af= ter all >>> > this time is a mark of it's worth. > >> Unfortunately, many of us do not find that it 'just works'. =A0There is >> no-one to ask for support, so people resort to asking ports@ or in >> IRC. >> >> It is also unmaintained, and has many bugs against it: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?text=3Dportupgrade > > > He said *portmanager* =A0There aren't any open PRs against portmanager an= d > it has a maintainer. Ouch, sorry -- got confused with the plethora of portupgrade threads I'm in at the moment :/ Chris, I did misread your email-- portmanager appears absolutely fine, and is in no danger of removal :) Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_JUrBkRcrw_FZBhre39dgbNmOE-V385A8jbaSwecEOcw>