From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 19 18:06:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00D616A4DD for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4893243D45 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:06:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1G3GRB-000JTo-Qn; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:06:21 +0400 Message-ID: <44BE74AC.1080501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:06:36 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" References: <44BCF5F0.7090809@gmx.de> <44BDD5AB.3060801@FreeBSD.org> <44BE00DA.4030901@gmx.de> <20060719151014.GB32499@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <44BE64E2.1050905@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <44BE64E2.1050905@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brooks Davis , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: makewhatis from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:06:25 -0000 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:52:26AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>> Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >>>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>>>> I've got a Makefile where I install man pages int PREFIX/man/man1 and the ports system nicely compresses them, but it does not make them available for whatis. Should I run makewhatis PREFIX/man manually or is there a way this is supposed to be done? The Porter's Handbook chapter 5.9 does not mention whatis. >>>> It will be done with weekly script 320.whatis. >>>> I think we have no practice to do it when a port is installed. >>>> >>> Thanks for the reply. >>> >>> That means I don't have to take care of it, still it would make more >>> sense to let the ports take care of it. >> If we're going to do it, setting MAN variables should cause it to happen >> in bsd.port.mk rather than having it done adhoc. >> >> -- Brooks > > That's what I was expecting in the first place. And it should be trivial to accomplish for someone who has the privileges to work on the Ports system. Everyone have privileges to work on the Ports system. :) -- Dixi. Sem.