Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:13:23 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> To: John Von Essen <john@quonix.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iftop... Message-ID: <20050603071323.GA69443@sinanica.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <13f6e3df2305b912e42aa453570a8c55@quonix.net> References: <13f6e3df2305b912e42aa453570a8c55@quonix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:10:00PM -0400, John Von Essen wrote: > Ports is listed as the maintainer for this package. >=20 > I have noticed (4.10) that when you quit out of iftop (version 0.16)=20 > two PIDs remain in the background. If you run iftop again, another two=20 > PID's are left, bringing it up to four, and so on. >=20 > Eventually, after the third or fourth time, you get: >=20 > interface: fxp0 > Cannot obtain hardware address on this platform > IP address is: 146.145.66.91 > pcap_open_live(fxp0): (no devices found) /dev/bpf4: No such file or=20 > directory >=20 > This behavior doesn't exist on Linux or Solaris platform. Should I=20 > submit a PR, or contact iftop developers first and see what they have=20 > to say? >=20 > PS - I'm not subscribed to the list, so please include my address in=20 > your reply. >=20 > Thanks > John Iftop's fork resolver is buggy. We should choose another one at configure-time. I will take care of that port. --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCoAMTFw6SP/bBpCARAldmAKDCQV/NEJka9/3oiF61gwwj/DRQBgCfRenX KLCH0zbI8/HyK/WDUjLk+/o= =sGbw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050603071323.GA69443>